Buechner talks about the significance of touch... I really gotta agree with his sentiments.
I hear your words. I see your face. I smell the rain in your hair,
the coffee on your breath. I am inside me experiencing you as you are
inside you experiencing me, but the you and the I themselves, those two
insiders, don't entirely meet until something else happens.
We shake hands perhaps. We pat each other on the back. At
parting or greeting, we may even go so far as to give each other a hug.
And now it has happened. We discover each other to be three-dimensional,
solid creatures of reality as well as dimensionless, airy creators of
it. We have an outside of flesh and bone as well as an inside where we
live and move and have our being.
Through simply touching, more directly than in any other
way, we can transmit to each other something of the power of the life we
have inside us. It is no wonder that the laying on of hands has always
been a traditional part of healing or that when Jesus was around, "all
the crowd sought to touch him" (Luke 6:19). It is no wonder that just
the touch of another human being at a dark time can be enough to save
the day.
- Originally published in Whistling in the Dark and later in Beyond Words
Sunday, August 31, 2014
Saturday, August 30, 2014
Buechner - Trinity
Again Buechner has a helpful and interesting take on the Trinity...
The much maligned doctrine of the Trinity is an assertion that, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding, there is only one God.
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit mean that the mystery beyond us, the mystery among us, and the mystery within us are all the same mystery. Thus the Trinity is a way of saying something about us and the way we experience God.
The Trinity is also a way of saying something about God and God's inner nature; that is, God does not need the creation in order to have something to love, because within God's being love happens. In other words, the love God is is love not as a noun, but as a verb. This verb is reflexive as well as transitive.
If the idea of God as both Three and One seems farfetched and obfuscating, look in the mirror someday.
There is (a) the interior life known only to yourself and those you choose to communicate it to (the Father). There is (b) the visible face, which in some measure reflects that inner life (the Son). And there is (c) the invisible power you have that enables you to communicate that interior life in such a way that others do not merely know about it, but know it in the sense of its becoming part of who they are (the Holy Spirit). Yet what you are looking at in the mirror is clearly and indivisibly the one and only you.
- Originally published in Wishful Thinking and later inBeyond Words
The much maligned doctrine of the Trinity is an assertion that, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding, there is only one God.
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit mean that the mystery beyond us, the mystery among us, and the mystery within us are all the same mystery. Thus the Trinity is a way of saying something about us and the way we experience God.
The Trinity is also a way of saying something about God and God's inner nature; that is, God does not need the creation in order to have something to love, because within God's being love happens. In other words, the love God is is love not as a noun, but as a verb. This verb is reflexive as well as transitive.
If the idea of God as both Three and One seems farfetched and obfuscating, look in the mirror someday.
There is (a) the interior life known only to yourself and those you choose to communicate it to (the Father). There is (b) the visible face, which in some measure reflects that inner life (the Son). And there is (c) the invisible power you have that enables you to communicate that interior life in such a way that others do not merely know about it, but know it in the sense of its becoming part of who they are (the Holy Spirit). Yet what you are looking at in the mirror is clearly and indivisibly the one and only you.
- Originally published in Wishful Thinking and later inBeyond Words
Monday, August 25, 2014
Toleration
Buechner's take on Toleration is worthy and multifaceted... I love the irony of the ending.
Toleration is often just indifference in disguise.
"It doesn't matter what religion you have as long as you have one" is apt to mean really, "I couldn't care less whether you have one or not."
If it means what it says, the question arises about a religion that demands, say, that firstborn children be fed to the crocodiles to ensure a good harvest. Somewhere lines have to be drawn. Sometimes it's not so easy to draw them.
Buddhism says, "Those who love a hundred have a hundred woes. Those who love ten have ten woes. Those who love one have one woe. Those who love none have no woe."
Christianity says, "Whoever does not love abides in death" (1 John 3:14). The trouble is that each speaks a different kind of truth. If you choose for one as the truer and more profound of the two, then you choose against the other, granting it only a kind of proximate validity. Thus toleration must be limited in the interests of honesty. It is sometimes argued that in our society the young should not be taught about Christianity. They should be taught about all religions. That is like saying they should be taught comparative linguistics before they have mastered English grammar.
It is sometimes argued that no religion of any kind should be taught in schools. The name of God should not be mentioned, prayers should not be prayed, religious holidays should not be observed — all of this to avoid in any way indoctrinating the young. This is itself, of course, the most powerful kind of indoctrination, because it is the most subtle and for that reason the hardest for the young or anybody else to defend themselves against. Given no reason to believe that the issue of God has any importance at all, or even exists as an issue, how can anybody make an intelligent decision either for God or against?
My wife went to a college in the fifties that was so tolerant religiously that it wouldn't allow an ordained minister to conduct an informal discussion group on the campus.
- Originally published in Wishful Thinking and later in Beyond Words
Toleration is often just indifference in disguise.
"It doesn't matter what religion you have as long as you have one" is apt to mean really, "I couldn't care less whether you have one or not."
If it means what it says, the question arises about a religion that demands, say, that firstborn children be fed to the crocodiles to ensure a good harvest. Somewhere lines have to be drawn. Sometimes it's not so easy to draw them.
Buddhism says, "Those who love a hundred have a hundred woes. Those who love ten have ten woes. Those who love one have one woe. Those who love none have no woe."
Christianity says, "Whoever does not love abides in death" (1 John 3:14). The trouble is that each speaks a different kind of truth. If you choose for one as the truer and more profound of the two, then you choose against the other, granting it only a kind of proximate validity. Thus toleration must be limited in the interests of honesty. It is sometimes argued that in our society the young should not be taught about Christianity. They should be taught about all religions. That is like saying they should be taught comparative linguistics before they have mastered English grammar.
It is sometimes argued that no religion of any kind should be taught in schools. The name of God should not be mentioned, prayers should not be prayed, religious holidays should not be observed — all of this to avoid in any way indoctrinating the young. This is itself, of course, the most powerful kind of indoctrination, because it is the most subtle and for that reason the hardest for the young or anybody else to defend themselves against. Given no reason to believe that the issue of God has any importance at all, or even exists as an issue, how can anybody make an intelligent decision either for God or against?
My wife went to a college in the fifties that was so tolerant religiously that it wouldn't allow an ordained minister to conduct an informal discussion group on the campus.
- Originally published in Wishful Thinking and later in Beyond Words
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
C.S. Lewis on how to act in love
The rule for all of us is perfectly simple. Do not waste time bothering
whether you ‘love’ your neighbour; act as if you did. As soon as we do
this we find one of the great secrets. When you are behaving as if you
loved someone, you will presently come to love him. If you injure
someone you dislike, you will find yourself disliking him more. If you
do him a good turn, you will find yourself disliking him less. There is,
indeed, one exception. If you do him a good turn, not to please God and
obey the law of charity, but to show him what a fine forgiving chap you
are, and to put him in your debt, and then sit down to wait for his
‘gratitude’, you will probably be disappointed. (People are not fools:
they have a very quick eye for anything like showing off, or patronage.)
But whenever we do good to another self, just because it is a self,
made (like us) by God, and desiring its own happiness as we desire ours,
we shall have learned to love it a little more or, at least, to dislike
it less.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Buechner on Story
We've been talking about story lately as a staff and this really makes a great connection to our faith story....
It is well to remember what the ancient creeds of the Christian faith declare credence in.
"God of God, Light of
Light... for us and for our salvation came down from heaven... born of
the Virgin Mary... suffered... crucified... dead... buried... rose
again... sitteth on the right hand of God... shall come again, with
glory, to judge both the quick and the dead." That is not a theological
idea or a religious system. It is a series of largely flesh-and-blood
events that happened, are happening, will happen in time and space. For
better or worse, it is a story.
It is well to remember because it keeps our eyes on the central fact that the Christian faith always
has to do with flesh and blood, time and space, more specifically with
your flesh and blood and mine, with the time and space that day by day
we are all of us involved with, stub our toes on, flounder around in
trying to look as if we have good sense. In other words, the truth that
Christianity claims to be true is ultimately to be found, if it's to be
found at all, not in the Bible, or the church, or theology — the best
they can do is point to the truth — but in our own stories.
If the God you believe
in as an idea doesn't start showing up in what happens to you in your
own life, you have as much cause for concern as if the God you don't
believe in as an idea does start showing up.
It is absolutely
crucial, therefore, to keep in constant touch with what is going on in
your own life's story and to pay close attention to what is going on in
the stories of others' lives. If God is present anywhere, it is in those
stories that God is present. If God is not present in those stories,
then they are scarcely worth telling.
- Originally published in Whistling in the Dark and later in Beyond Words
Saturday, August 9, 2014
Children's religious instruction via C.S. Lewis
I really like what Lewis is saying here, particularly about greatness using the Pascal quote...
TO EDWARD LOFSTROM: On
what Lewis attempted in the Chronicles of Narnia; on the character of
the man Jesus—his tenderness, ferocity, and even humor; and on the need
to do one’s duty while having patience with God.
16 January 1959
1.
I am afraid I don’t know the answer to your question about books of
Christian instruction for children. Most of those I have seen—but I
haven’t seen many—seem to me namby-pamby and ‘sissie’ and calculated to
nauseate any child worth his salt. Of course I have tried to do what I
can for children—in a mythical and fantastic form by my seven ‘Narnian’
fairy tales. They work well with some children but not with others.
Sorry this looks like salesman- ship: but honestly if I knew anything
else I’d mention it.
2. Of
course. ‘Gentle Jesus’, my elbow! The most striking thing about Our Lord
is the union of great ferocity with extreme tenderness. (Remember
Pascal? ‘I do not admire the extreme of one virtue unless you show me at
the same time the extreme of the opposite virtue. One shows one’s
greatness not by being at an extremity but by being simultaneously at
two extremities and filling all the space between.’)
Add
to this that He is also a supreme ironist, dialectician, and
(occasionally) humourist. So go on! You are on the right track now:
getting to the real Man behind all the plaster dolls that have been
substituted for Him. This is the appearance in Human form of the God who
made the Tiger and the Lamb, the avalanche and the rose. He’ll frighten and puzzle you: but the real Christ can be loved and admired as the doll can’t.
3.
‘For him who is haunted by the smell of invisible roses the cure is
work’ (MacDonald). If we feel we have talents that don’t find expression
in our ordinary duties and recreations, I think we must just go on
doing the ordinary things as well as we can. If God wants to use these
suspected talents, He will: in His own time and way. At all costs one
must keep clear of all the witchdoctors and their patent cures—as you
say yourself.
Saturday, August 2, 2014
Follow the Signs - C.S. Lewis again... Silver Chair
But long before she had got
anywhere near the edge, the voice behind her said, “Stand still. In a
moment I will blow. But, first, remember, remember, remember the signs.
Say them to yourself when you wake in the morning and when you lie down
at night, and when you wake in the middle of the night. And whatever
strange things may happen to you, let nothing turn your mind from
following the signs. And secondly, I give you a warning. Here on the
mountain I have spoken to you clearly: I will not often do so down in
Narnia. Here on the mountain, the air is clear and your mind is clear;
as you drop down into Narnia, the air will thicken. Take great care that
it does not confuse your mind. And the signs which you have learned
here will not look at all as you expect them to look, when you meet them
there. That is why it is so important to know them by heart and pay no
attention to appearances. Remember the signs and believe the signs.
Nothing else matters. And now, daughter of Eve, farewell—”
The Silver Chair. Copyright © 1953 by C. S. Lewis Pte., Ltd. Copyright
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)