I came across this quote in a blog of "The Wardrobe Door" that has some very good things to say.
Disagreement does not mean hate and tolerance cannot mean being tolerant of only the things with which you agree.
If modern tolerance allows you to attack someone's religious beliefs
because they dared to share them, when asked for, then modern tolerance
is worthless except as a way to silence critics.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Fashioned from the Same Clay
This Eugene Peterson devotion was particularly cool in light of my encounter with Cheap Trick's Rick Nielsen yesterday morning at the ACE hardware with my chapel band kids.
All the same, we continue to have an unquenchable thirst for wholeness, a hunger for righteousness. When we get thoroughly disgusted with the shams and cretins that are served up to us daily as celebrities, some of us turn to Scriptures to satisfy our need for someone to look up to. What does it mean to be a real man, a real woman? What shape does mature, authentic humanity take in everyday life?
When we do turn to Scripture for help in the matter we are apt to be surprised. One of the first things that strikes us about the men and women in Scripture is that they were disappointingly hon heroic. We do not find splendid moral examples. We do not find impeccably virtuous models. That always comes as a shock to new comers to Scripture: Abraham lied; Jacob cheated; Moses murdered and complained; David committed adultery [and murder]; Peter blasphemed.
We read on and begin to suspect intention: a consistent strategy to demonstrate that the great, significant figures in the life of faith were fashioned from the same clay as the rest of us. We find that Scripture is sparing in the information that it gives on people while it is lavish in what it tells us on God. It refuses to feed our lust for hero worship. It will not pander to our adolescent desire to join a fan club. The reason is, I think, clear enough. Fan clubs encourage second hand living. Through pictures and memorabilia, autographs and tourist visits, we associate with someone whose life is (we think) more exciting and glamorous than our own. We find diversion from our own humdrum existence by riding on the coattails of someone exotic.
Living the Message: Daily Reflections with Eugene Peterson; April 16, pp. 115-116
All the same, we continue to have an unquenchable thirst for wholeness, a hunger for righteousness. When we get thoroughly disgusted with the shams and cretins that are served up to us daily as celebrities, some of us turn to Scriptures to satisfy our need for someone to look up to. What does it mean to be a real man, a real woman? What shape does mature, authentic humanity take in everyday life?
When we do turn to Scripture for help in the matter we are apt to be surprised. One of the first things that strikes us about the men and women in Scripture is that they were disappointingly hon heroic. We do not find splendid moral examples. We do not find impeccably virtuous models. That always comes as a shock to new comers to Scripture: Abraham lied; Jacob cheated; Moses murdered and complained; David committed adultery [and murder]; Peter blasphemed.
We read on and begin to suspect intention: a consistent strategy to demonstrate that the great, significant figures in the life of faith were fashioned from the same clay as the rest of us. We find that Scripture is sparing in the information that it gives on people while it is lavish in what it tells us on God. It refuses to feed our lust for hero worship. It will not pander to our adolescent desire to join a fan club. The reason is, I think, clear enough. Fan clubs encourage second hand living. Through pictures and memorabilia, autographs and tourist visits, we associate with someone whose life is (we think) more exciting and glamorous than our own. We find diversion from our own humdrum existence by riding on the coattails of someone exotic.
Living the Message: Daily Reflections with Eugene Peterson; April 16, pp. 115-116
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Humanly Best
I really wasn't originally going to post this, but it's just so good and kind of went in a direction that I wasn't expecting....
After Buechner's father's death, the family moved to Bermuda, rather to Grandma Buechner's disapproval:
"YOU SHOULD STAY AND face
reality," she wrote, and in terms of what was humanly best, this was
perhaps the soundest advice she could have given us: that we should stay
and, through sheer Scharmann endurance, will, courage, put our lives
back together by becoming as strong as she was herself. But when i t
comes to putting broken lives back together— when it comes, in religious
terms, to the saving of souls—the human best tends to be at odds with
the holy best. To do for yourself the best that you have it in you to
do—to grit your teeth and clench your fists in order to survive the
world at its harshest and worst—is, by that very act, to be unable to
let something be done for you and in you that is more wonderful still.
The trouble with steeling yourself against the harshness of reality is
that the same steel that secures your life against being destroyed
secures your life also against being opened up and transformed by the
holy power that life itself comes from. You can survive on your own. You
can grow strong on your own. You can even prevail on your own. But you
cannot become human on your own. Surely that is why, in Jesus' sad joke,
the rich man has as hard a time getting into Paradise as that camel
through the needle's eye because with his credit card in his pocket, the
rich man is so effective at getting for himself everything he needs
that he does not see that what he needs more than anything else in the
world can be had only as a gift. He does not see that the one thing a
clenched fist cannot do is accept, even from le bon Dieu himself, a
helping hand.
- Originally published in The Sacred Journey
Monday, April 8, 2013
Praise, Praise
I just got some sad news about a couple of my students and the following Buechner quote is really appropriate.... it's one of those quotes that needs re-reading to fully appreciate its beauty.
Godric is speaking:
"PRAISE, PRAISE!" I croak. Praise
God for all that's holy, cold, and dark. Praise him for all we lose,
for all the river of the years bears off. Praise him for stillness in
the wake of pain. Praise him for emptiness. And as you race to spill
into the sea, praise him yourself, old Wear. Praise him for dying and
the peace of death.
In the little church I built of
wood for Mary, I hollowed out a place for him. Perkin brings him by the
pail and pours him in. Now that I can hardly walk, 1 crawl to meet him
there. He takes me in his chilly lap to wash me of my sins. Or I kneel
down beside him till within his depths I see a star.
Sometimes this star is still.
Sometimes she dances. She is Mary's star. Within that little pool of
Wear she winks at me. I wink at her. The secret that we share I cannot
tell in full. But this much I will tell. What's lost is nothing to
what's found, and all the death that ever was, set next to life, would
scarcely fill a cup.
- Originally published in Godric
Thursday, April 4, 2013
All is Well - Buechner ... again.
ANXIETY AND FEAR are what we know
best in this fantastic century of ours. Wars and rumors of wars. From
civilization itself to what seemed the most unalterable values of the
past, everything is threatened or already in ruins. We have heard so
much tragic news that when the news is good we cannot hear it.
But the proclamation of Easter
Day is that all is well. And as a Christian, I say this not with the
easy optimism of one who has never known a time when all was not well
but as one who has faced the Cross in all its obscenity as well as in
all its glory, who has known one way or another what it is like to live
separated from God. In the end, his will, not ours, is done. Love is the
victor. Death is not the end. The end is life. His life and our lives
through him, in him. Existence has greater depths of beauty, mystery,
and benediction than the wildest visionary has ever dared to dream.
Christ our Lord has risen.
- Originally published in The Magnificent Defeat
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
The Resurrection
I've been stealing a lot from Buechner lately. I love how this east coast "liberal" academic pastor writer cuts through the misguided interpretations and lays out the significance of the literal nature of the resurrection.
WE CAN SAY THAT the story of the
Resurrection means simply that the teachings of Jesus are immortal like
the plays of Shakespeare or the music of Beethoven and that their wisdom
and truth will live on forever. Or we can say that the Resurrection
means that the spirit of Jesus is undying, that he himself lives on
among us, the way that Socrates does, for instance, in the good that he
left behind him, in the lives of all who follow his great example. Or we
can say that the language in which the Gospels describe the
Resurrection of Jesus is the language of poetry and that, as such, it is
not to be taken literally but as pointing to a truth more profound than
the literal. Very often, I think, this is the way that the Bible is
written, and I would point to some of the stories about the birth of
Jesus, for instance, as examples; but in the case of the Resurrection,
this simply does not apply because there really is no story about the
Resurrection in the New Testament. Except in the most fragmentary way,
it is not described at all. There is no poetry about it. Instead, it is
simply proclaimed as a fact. Christ is risen!
In fact, the very existence of the New Testament itself proclaims it.
Unless something very real indeed took place on that strange, confused
morning, there would be no New Testament, no Church, no Christianity.
Yet we try to reduce it to poetry
anyway: the coming of spring with the return of life to the dead earth,
the rebirth of hope in the despairing soul. We try to suggest that
these are the miracles that the Resurrection is all about, but they are
not. In their way they are all miracles, but they are not this miracle,
this central one to which the whole Christian faith points.
Unlike the chief priests and the
Pharisees, who tried with soldiers and a great stone to make themselves
as secure as they could against the terrible possibility of Christ's
really rising again from the dead, we are considerably more subtle. We
tend in our age to say, "Of course, it was bound to happen. Nothing
could stop it." But when we are pressed to say what it was that actually
did happen, what we are apt to come out with is something pretty
meager: this "miracle" of truth that never dies, the "miracle" of a life
so beautiful that two thousand years have left the memory of it
undimmed, the "miracle" of doubt turning into faith, fear into hope. If I
believed that this or something like this was all that the Resurrection
meant, then I would turn in my certificate of ordination and take up
some other profession. Or at least I hope that I would have the courage
to.
- Originally published in The Alphabet of Grace
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)